The Chinese dilemma of waste-to-energy plants

The Chinese dilemma of waste-to-energy plants

My list

Author | Jaime RamosThe urban growth projection for the coming decades brings with it new challenges. One of these is the issue of how to manage the waste that is generated, which is increasing at an alarming rate and particularly in specific areas of the planet.Storing and recycling waste are fast becoming a specific sector that requires efficient and clean technological solutions. China is aiming to go one step further by focusing its efforts on converting waste into energy at never before seen levels. The latest and impressive project aimed at contributing to this goal can be found at the mega-plant that is being built in the city of Shenzhen.

Shenzhen and the new generation of incineration plants

Chinese cities produce more waste than any other city in the world. In the case of Shenzhen and, according to SHL, the company behind the project, the city has to deal with around 15,000 tonnes of waste every day. Furthermore, the problem is not just about existing waste practices, but also what to do with future waste. The increase in the population of Shenzhen means that waste generation will increase by around 7% each year.chinese waste incinerationThe solution put forward by the SHL architects, consists of a giant plant covering an area of 112,645 m2, capable of incinerating one third of the city’s existing waste and generating energy. It is estimated that it could produce around 550 million kWh per year. The roof of the main building would provide part of the electricity thanks to the installation of 44,000 mof solar panels.The idea is for this complex to enhance the image of China’s existing waste incineration plants. To do so, the most advanced technological systems will be installed and this micro-city deigned for waste management will also be used as an information point for Shenzhen’s citizens.

Chinese waste management model: advantages and disadvantages

The Shenzhen plant is expected to be running by 2020. Work began in 2016 and since then, the project has had its fair share of critics. One of the clearest examples is related to the fact that the process of converting waste into electricity does not prevent the emission of large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The developers of the complex defended the project by arguing that the new plant minimises greenhouse gas emissions.china smogThe residents in the area where the large building is being constructed have also expressed their dissatisfaction through protests.  In fact, protests in China as a result of the installation of incineration plants are becoming more common. The authorities in turn, are not backing down and they are determined to continue with their commitment to improve waste incineration processes. Accordingly, the goal is to build a further 300 plants similar to those in Shenzhen, in other cities across China.Is there an alternative to waste incineration?Much of the negative criticism received by waste-to-energy conversion processes stems from the fact that, in the energy sector, 100% clean production processes should be implemented. But then, what should we do with the thousands of tonnes generated every day?  The other main option, instead of burning our waste, is not to generate waste and to recycle it.Although these may seem like more complicated options to actually implement, many large cities such as San Francisco are already studying plans along these lines. Perhaps the issue for China is whether, with its existing rate of waste generation, it can sustain solutions like these, which require a longer-term approach.Images | iStock/Denise Hasse, iStock/TomasSeredaiStock/c1a1p1c1o1m1

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

ML
Matheus Lage
CML Energy
CEO
AP
Akshay Parel
Voltigent Company
Owner
VG
Vahid Ghaeminezhad
NextWave
Code developer
LO
luis oblitas
utec
student
PA
Paola Aldaz
DDB group
Chief Innovation Officer
SD
SARVESH DWIVEDI
NA
Human resources
FC
Fabrício Costa
Oby
Project Manager
AB
Arief Rahman Baihaqi
MAN 2 PEKANBARU
12 grade
CC
Carlos J Castano
Surtigas
Operations Manager
SZ
Stefania Zerbato
Smartea Srl
Amministratore
AD
Alberto Danese
UPC
PhD researcher
JM
Jaideep Mainkar
TENERGY INDIA PVT. LTD.
Director
CF
CHRISTOFER Friberg
MontLibre Group / KTH Viable Cities
Founder
PS
PASCHOAL SANSONI
UCLIMA
Head of Climate Change and Desister Risk and ESG.
MK
Michael Kolmer
City of Darmstadt, Dep. of Economy and Urban Development
Head of Department of Economy and Urban Development
SH
Susan Hassan
Al-Nahrain
Professor
ZF
Zoltán Fenyősi
Faktivitás Kft.
CEO
SN
Suresh N
Self Employed
Director
BV
Benjamin Varese
RE-CIRCULA SOLUTIONS SL
Business Development Manager
OM
Oscar Malaspina
Lima 2035
Food Citizen