Pedestrianizing cities: Yes, but with alternatives

Pedestrianizing cities: Yes, but with alternatives

My list

*Author | Patricia M. Liceras

Pedestrianizing historic city centers is becoming increasingly common. The aim is to dethrone the car as the king of the city center in order to provide more areas for pedestrians, walkers and cyclists, reduce air pollution and create opportunities that allow new and closer relationships to be established between residents.

In fact, the “15-minute city” concept has gained popularity recently, defended by Anne Hidalgo, the Mayor of Paris. These are cities in which one can fulfil all their professional, educational, health, leisure or any other requirements, with short journeys from home, either on foot or on a bike. Particularly in the future post-COVID era, which will lead to the full emergence of teleworking and the subsequent reduction of journeys from home to the office and vice versa.

However, with this form of urban planning, which reduces or blocks car access. Is it all good news? Are there any downsides?

Advantages of pedestrianization

PIC 1

Pedestrianizing cities is an unstoppable trend at a global level and it does bring with it many advantages. It not only improves road safety, since most fatal accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists take place in city centers, but it also increases pedestrian mobility, which has undoubtable positive effects on the health of the population.

It also reduces pollution and improves the quality of life of residents and pedestrians, with less environmental noise, improved air quality and more spaces for green areas and socializing.

And of course, with wider sidewalks, people tend to walk more and can access stores more easily, which boosts commerce in the new pedestrian areas, and increases the value of property, which benefits owners.

Disadvantages of pedestrianization

PIC 2

However, replacing asphalt with cobblestones in order to make cities more pleasant for their residents and more respectful with the planet, is not a miracle tool devoid of disadvantages. Disadvantages tend to arise when cars are eradicated from cities, by means of a municipal ordinance, without proper planning and execution, and without offering suitable mobility options for thousands of affected people.

On the one hand, residents in these areas tend to use their cars in their day to day activities and restricting the use of their vehicles may lead, not only to the residents opposing these types of measures, but may even cause them to move to other areas of the city without traffic limitations. As a result, houses would be occupied mainly by students, temporary tenants and tourists, displacing the original population. Therefore, these processes must be flexible for residents, avoiding falling into a sense of leniency, which would diminish the effectiveness of the pedestrianization, but without strictness either, which could leave these places bare of their normal residents.

Convincing mobility options should also be offered to other groups that are particularly affected: residents of the suburbs who work in the center, since their journey to work would be greatly affected. Options which, among other aspects, should include boosting and extending the public transport network.

Furthermore, when an area is shut off to four-wheeled traffic, these vehicles do not just disappear as if by magic, instead, they end up concentrating on nearby roads, normally leading to traffic jams, air and noise pollution, car parking and traffic congestion, etc. Therefore, existing traffic flows must be carefully studied, to ensure the proposed restructuring plans do not saturate the surrounding areas.

Disadvantages that could be mitigated if the projects are managed with the right precision. Therefore, the pros do seem to far outweigh the cons, when it comes to living in cities that prioritize pedestrians over cars. The issue would not be whether or not to pedestrianize them, but rather how to avoid pedestrianizing them in a disorganized manner or just because it is in vogue.

Images | Jan Antonin Kolar, Julian Tong, Kilian Seiler

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

ML
Manuel Lozano Rodriguez
Disclosing Social Science
Founder
MR
Mitchelle Rosales
HFT
HFT
AS
Adrian Slatcher
Manchester City Council
Principal Resource and Programmes Officer, City Policy.
GS
Gabor Csaba Sooki-Toth
University of Gyor
Assistant Professor
PZ
Patricia Zeegers
Business Basecamp
CEO
AS
Andréia Sant\'Anna
Centro Universitário Newton Paiva
Smart Campus Superviser
NK
Niamh Kelly
Newcastle University
2nd year BA architecture student at Newcastle University
FR
Fateme Rezaee Varchaghi
University
I am researchist
MA
Murat Aksu
MUUM DESIGN CONSULTANTS
Partner
MB
Miguel Betancor
University
Teacher
NN
Nuno Neto
APEXA
Creative and Project Development
YJ
YUN Jeongmin
Intercom
Assistant Manager
AM
Anna Mitrolios
Kanozi Arkitekter, Anna Mitrolios
Projectleader
LE
LEMAITRE ERIK
K2A Knaust & Andersson Fastigheter AB
Part of group management
BG
Beatriz Guijarro-Turégano
Freelance
Head of data analytics in Liquen Data Lab. PhD candidate in urban anthropology.
NR
Norfakaruddin Razi Saari Razi Saari
Majlis Perbandaran Pasir Gudang
Senior Executive
DM
DIANA MENDOZA
DAVIARI
Chief Marketing Officer
EM
Erica Miranda
My House
I'm interested in urban planning in smart cities.
CD
Cindy Danieles
Fredensborg Kommune
Digitalization consultant
IQ
Irfan Qalamkar
Sorbonne
ICT Services Lead