Pedestrianizing cities: Yes, but with alternatives

Pedestrianizing cities: Yes, but with alternatives

My list

*Author | Patricia M. Liceras

Pedestrianizing historic city centers is becoming increasingly common. The aim is to dethrone the car as the king of the city center in order to provide more areas for pedestrians, walkers and cyclists, reduce air pollution and create opportunities that allow new and closer relationships to be established between residents.

In fact, the “15-minute city” concept has gained popularity recently, defended by Anne Hidalgo, the Mayor of Paris. These are cities in which one can fulfil all their professional, educational, health, leisure or any other requirements, with short journeys from home, either on foot or on a bike. Particularly in the future post-COVID era, which will lead to the full emergence of teleworking and the subsequent reduction of journeys from home to the office and vice versa.

However, with this form of urban planning, which reduces or blocks car access. Is it all good news? Are there any downsides?

Advantages of pedestrianization

PIC 1

Pedestrianizing cities is an unstoppable trend at a global level and it does bring with it many advantages. It not only improves road safety, since most fatal accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists take place in city centers, but it also increases pedestrian mobility, which has undoubtable positive effects on the health of the population.

It also reduces pollution and improves the quality of life of residents and pedestrians, with less environmental noise, improved air quality and more spaces for green areas and socializing.

And of course, with wider sidewalks, people tend to walk more and can access stores more easily, which boosts commerce in the new pedestrian areas, and increases the value of property, which benefits owners.

Disadvantages of pedestrianization

PIC 2

However, replacing asphalt with cobblestones in order to make cities more pleasant for their residents and more respectful with the planet, is not a miracle tool devoid of disadvantages. Disadvantages tend to arise when cars are eradicated from cities, by means of a municipal ordinance, without proper planning and execution, and without offering suitable mobility options for thousands of affected people.

On the one hand, residents in these areas tend to use their cars in their day to day activities and restricting the use of their vehicles may lead, not only to the residents opposing these types of measures, but may even cause them to move to other areas of the city without traffic limitations. As a result, houses would be occupied mainly by students, temporary tenants and tourists, displacing the original population. Therefore, these processes must be flexible for residents, avoiding falling into a sense of leniency, which would diminish the effectiveness of the pedestrianization, but without strictness either, which could leave these places bare of their normal residents.

Convincing mobility options should also be offered to other groups that are particularly affected: residents of the suburbs who work in the center, since their journey to work would be greatly affected. Options which, among other aspects, should include boosting and extending the public transport network.

Furthermore, when an area is shut off to four-wheeled traffic, these vehicles do not just disappear as if by magic, instead, they end up concentrating on nearby roads, normally leading to traffic jams, air and noise pollution, car parking and traffic congestion, etc. Therefore, existing traffic flows must be carefully studied, to ensure the proposed restructuring plans do not saturate the surrounding areas.

Disadvantages that could be mitigated if the projects are managed with the right precision. Therefore, the pros do seem to far outweigh the cons, when it comes to living in cities that prioritize pedestrians over cars. The issue would not be whether or not to pedestrianize them, but rather how to avoid pedestrianizing them in a disorganized manner or just because it is in vogue.

Images | Jan Antonin Kolar, Julian Tong, Kilian Seiler

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

UD
UDAY DALVI
ARAGORN INFRATECH PVT LTD
DIRECTOR
YL
Yulia Lesnichaya
Sustainable Development Solutions Network
Project Officer, Communications
ML
Manuel Lozano Rodriguez
Disclosing Social Science
Founder
CR
Citlalli Rios
EXATEC GTA
Philanthropy Co-ordinator
PN
Prasetya Adhi Nugraha
Unesa
Student
MG
Maria Gympaki
European Master in Tourism Management
postgraduate student
MB
Marc Batallé
Lighthinklab
Product Manager
JG
Jessica Guzman
Iadb
Projects Assistant
AD
Ana Diogo
Student
I´m doing research regarding to the impact of Smart Cities in Social and Demographic Axes.
DW
David Wentacem
Pushtifor
Director/ Editor
FM
Ferran Muñoz
Ajuntament de Calella
Project Manager Calella SMART TOURISM DESTINATION
GG
Gabriel Grajales
Universidad Intercultural Indígena de MIchoacán
Coordinator of the Bachelor of Arts and Cultural Heritage
BE
Benjamin Edmonds
London Legacy Development Corporation
IT Programme Manager
DK
Dennis Jason Kandukuri
Feeding India
Business Development
LJ
Luke Jones
Music Cities Events
RG
Ricardo Enrique Gomez
Argentine government
Administrative
GG
Genesis Gavino
City of Dallas
Resilience Officer
KL
Karina Lavik
Nordic Edge Expo
Communications Manager
MT
Mohamed Tatanaki
Roken Al Khalig
N/a
SG
SeokMei Goh
Graffiquo
CEO