drugs
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Three cities that have managed to reduce drug use

My list

Author | Jaime Ramos

The negative impacts of drug use are one of the most serious problems in urban areas. Today, a number of cities are achieving positive results in the war on drugs and other drug-associated problems including corruption, crime and inequality.

What are drugs? A universal definition

Drugs are any natural or synthetic substance that can have numerous disruptive effects on the organism. These include their impact on the nervous system; changes at a psychological or physiological level; and, in their most negative form, the capacity of drugs to generate addiction and dependence, together with fatal impacts on health.

Drug use dates back to before the start of civilization. There are references dating back more than 4,000 years indicating the production and consumption of alcohol, opium or cannabis in Egypt, Mesopotamia or China, respectively. Fossils with remains have even been found from the Neolithic Period.

Drugs as a problem

The problems related to the use of drugs are as old as the consumption itself. In recent centuries, drugs have emerged as an ingredient interwoven in urban dynamics related to poverty, inequality and social collapse.

Among other countries, many cities in the United States have been fighting a war on drugs for decades. Many of them have lost this war. However, the situation is different depending on the substance. Still in the U.S., heroin continues to be a major problem in cities such as Indianapolis or Omaha, with levels reaching over 3% of the population.

In Asia, the drug phenomenon is the result of systemic disease patterns. According to the United Nations, East and Southeast Asia  are one of the main drug production and trafficking regions of the world. In Spring, more than one billion methamphetamine tablets were seized, around 172 tons.

Cities with real solutions

drugs 2

Is there a solution to drug trafficking and the associated problems? Of course there is. There are examples in various cities that have found solutions to alleviate or eradicate their harmful social effects.

Amsterdam

The Dutch capital suffered the scourge of two substances; cannabis among anti-system groups and heroin among disadvantaged groups. The authorities’ initial repressive responses were unsuccessful. They aggravated the problem.

During a second stage, the city council collaborated with health services to establish more appropriate measures. Slowly, they introduced initiatives designed to combat the epidemic and cover some of the requirements demanded by the public. The city separated the consumption of hard and soft drugs; or it distinguished between consumption and sale, and boosted the health perspective.

Amsterdam’s open policies gained it international fame, but also tourists. Today, the city is trying to reverse some of the perverse effects of its solutions, such as the emergence of drug tourism.

Lisbon

A more recent example can be found in Lisbon. Portugal and its capital also experienced their own particular crisis during the ’80s. Three districts in Lisbon became known as the drug supermarket, involving a vast portion of the population and thousands of daily visitors.

In 2001, Portugal became the first country to decriminalize drug use. The country’s statistics could not be better, with a drop in drug use and hepatic infections or AIDS. To date it has not been so much of a liberalization strategy, but rather a strategy to raise awareness and disable the groups that were benefiting from it. Its success has reached international levels.

Vancouver

Although drug use is still related to cases of violence, Vancouver’s public policies have had positive results. The expert on substance use, Thomas Kerr, has confirmed this, indicating that the trend within the city is changing, with fewer people injecting drugs and less consumption.

The researcher associates this with two aspects: less authoritarian policies and greater dedication in the health system. These patterns tend to lead to cities with better results. Despite many having gained popularity as liberating cities, the truth is that the success of the strategies is related to investment in education programs, together with health and social protection programs.

Images | Wikimedia.commons/Marek Ślusarczyk, Freepik/freepik

Related Content

Recommended profiles for you

ÁM
Ángela Beatriz Martinez
RMS
Directora
AA
Alice Assad Wassall
IPCCIC
Researcher
FB
Fernando Betancourt Escobar
DATAYSERVICE
Gerente General
KA
Karina Amirgamzaeva
University of Girona
Student
NN
Nuno Neto
APEXA
Creative and Project Development
NG
Natalia Gozdur
Mobile World Capital Barcelona
Head of Civic Lab, Digital Future Society
AB
Alice Carolina Bello Barros
PUC Goiás
Student
KK
Kaushal Karkhanis
Exotic Gringo
Chief Designer & Travel Blogger
SP
Sayon Pramanik
National Institute of Technology Raipur
Assistant Professor
AS
Anita Shervington
BLAST Fest Ltd
Founder
PC
Pilar Conesa
Smart City Expo World Congress
Curator
DM
Deva Menéndez
GeoSolutions
Internshiper
AB
Andreas Beavor
UrbanEmerge
Managing Partner
WW
Wena wahyudi wena
Otakiri Network
Strategic Corp Planner
HM
Huber Michael
Studio F. A. Porsche / Porsche Design
Global Business Development\\nDesign Services, Sales & Marketing Cooperation with 3rd party companies
SS
Shaurya Somani
Urban Liveability Forum
Director
MM
michelle michelle0312
University
College student
MS
Marina Semekhina
Soft Engineering
We develop digital platform solutions and products for smart and sustainable cities.
BR
Betzy Rodriguez
Independent
Universidad de Buenos Aires UBA
NT
Nonopa Tenza
Standard Bank
Smart Cities Expert