Can citizens design their own streets?

Can citizens design their own streets?

My list

Author | Jaime RamosThe fully realized smart city ideal offers a tool that goes beyond the advanced use of technology to improve the life of its citizens: the capacity to enable citizens to have a say not just in matters related to public affairs, but the city’s own urban organization.

The future of urban planning

One of the finest examples of this democratic instrument is the possibility of being involved in the urban planning process. A process which, traditionally, has not included the average citizen. Neighborhood associations and related groups have fought in recent years for the voices of the people to be heard.Despite this and the fact that regulations now establish some formulas for engagement (such as social councils in cities), local authorities have the last word in terms of urban design and street furniture. Smart cities aims to overthrow this model. In terms of urban design, the future of urban planning goes beyond simply listening to citizens, to actually place them at the center of all strategies.

Setting an example in participative urban planning

Aerial view of Salt Lake CityThe capital of the state of Utah, Salt Lake City, has around 200,000 inhabitants in its historic center and it seeks to establish a precedent in the area of smart urban planning. In fact, the project has begun by revolutionizing the classic street typologies applied in this area. Until now, there were three types of roads in the United States:

  • Arterial.
  • Collectors or distributors.
  • Local.

This model shared by many major cities, is based on facilitating the flow of traffic in the city. The system is also responsible for the Cartesian layouts that exist in so many major cities across the country. Now, well into the 21st century, the aim is to steal the leading role away from cars.

Salt Lake City’s smart urban planning project

Salt lake city downtownCitizens have a real say in this task. Salt Lake City launched a survey last Autumn, which defined up to 15 types of roads, based on the different urban functionalities. This not only enables greater engagement, but also opens the door to customized urban planning designs.The new typologies are applied to over 8,400 roads in the center and they are included in a guide with real models made public by the authorities. To create these, five factors regarding public use spaces were taken into account:

  • Personal mobility, in terms of pedestrians, bikes and PMVs.
  • Mobility of other vehicles.
  • The environment (greening), relating to minimum sustainability requirements and green spaces.
  • That is, the concept of a street as a social activity and not just as a walking exercise.
  • Use of sidewalks.

Citizen contributions

Urban planning guideIn a subsequent chapter, the citizens of Salt Lake City have finalized the 15 types of streets and, in general, the guide, providing more feedback through the enabled web platform. In order to make it more accessible, it offers a map, which distinguishes the type of streets according to a color code and in which comments can be added to each street. This way, urban planners gain valuable insights about its given or expected usage well before construction machinery starts rolling.After this phase, the authorities will draw up a final draft of the guide, the standards of which will be used by urban planners when the city’s next map is designed.

Towards a more humane and inclusive urban planning

Citizen participation in matters of urban planning can push towards the development of streets and blocks far more accessible, taking into account both large collectives and also minorities, empowering stakeholders at all levels and reducing the dependence on simple statistics that may distort the full picture. These measures can be complemented with innovative projects such as Block by block, which allows citizens to create a basic digital twin using the popular videogame Minecraft.The basic needs of each city can drastically differ due to their soecieties, economies and preexisting circumstances. All in all, the most common reactions of the Salt Lake City inhabitants tend to demand more public space for people and less for vehicles.Images | Yhz1221 (CC BY-SA 3.0), Matt Milton, Padraic Ryan (CC BY-SA 3.0), Street & Intersection Typologies Design Guide 

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

AM
andrew murray
GTAC
Technical Advisor
OT
Olga Trunova
University of Bologna
PhD candidate
MD
Matheus Delbon
Evoluta
Director
BV
Bart van Gils
Utrecht University
Junior Researcher at the faculty of Social Geography, Geosciences
XP
Xavier Perarnau
SEYS
VA TIG BUSINESS MANAGER
IC
Itzik Carmeli
Rishon Le-Zion Municipality
CIO
MG
María García Pizarro
Unión Iberoamericana de Municipalistas
Vicesecretaria general
AN
Andreas Nikolakopoulos
VLAAMSE ICT ORGANISATIE vzw
Program manager - COO
VD
Vaishali Deshmukh
wipro
Managing consultant
JP
Jorge Perez
asisbim
Lawyer
TT
Teddy Sukardi tedsuka
Ask Consulting
Consultant
VO
Vojko Obersnel
City of Rijeka
Executiv activities in municipality
KC
Kevin Comstock
City of Chattanooga TN
Director of Smart Cities
OS
Ovidiu Slimac
ROVEST Cluster
Secretary General
JC
Jeongsook Choi
Daegu Metropolitan City
Daegu Metropolitan City
PB
Pilar Ballén
Infracontrol
Project Manager
RT
Ramón M. Torra
Metropolitan Area of Barcelona
General manager of Metroplitan Area of Barcelona
PF
Pierre A. Filohn
BABLE UG
Organisational Development & Communication
TN
Tomoaki NISHITANI
NTT docomo Inc.
Person in Charge
ÇB
Çetin Bayatlı
Koçarlı Municipality
Manager