Can citizens design their own streets?

Can citizens design their own streets?

My list

Author | Jaime RamosThe fully realized smart city ideal offers a tool that goes beyond the advanced use of technology to improve the life of its citizens: the capacity to enable citizens to have a say not just in matters related to public affairs, but the city’s own urban organization.

The future of urban planning

One of the finest examples of this democratic instrument is the possibility of being involved in the urban planning process. A process which, traditionally, has not included the average citizen. Neighborhood associations and related groups have fought in recent years for the voices of the people to be heard.Despite this and the fact that regulations now establish some formulas for engagement (such as social councils in cities), local authorities have the last word in terms of urban design and street furniture. Smart cities aims to overthrow this model. In terms of urban design, the future of urban planning goes beyond simply listening to citizens, to actually place them at the center of all strategies.

Setting an example in participative urban planning

Aerial view of Salt Lake CityThe capital of the state of Utah, Salt Lake City, has around 200,000 inhabitants in its historic center and it seeks to establish a precedent in the area of smart urban planning. In fact, the project has begun by revolutionizing the classic street typologies applied in this area. Until now, there were three types of roads in the United States:

  • Arterial.
  • Collectors or distributors.
  • Local.

This model shared by many major cities, is based on facilitating the flow of traffic in the city. The system is also responsible for the Cartesian layouts that exist in so many major cities across the country. Now, well into the 21st century, the aim is to steal the leading role away from cars.

Salt Lake City’s smart urban planning project

Salt lake city downtownCitizens have a real say in this task. Salt Lake City launched a survey last Autumn, which defined up to 15 types of roads, based on the different urban functionalities. This not only enables greater engagement, but also opens the door to customized urban planning designs.The new typologies are applied to over 8,400 roads in the center and they are included in a guide with real models made public by the authorities. To create these, five factors regarding public use spaces were taken into account:

  • Personal mobility, in terms of pedestrians, bikes and PMVs.
  • Mobility of other vehicles.
  • The environment (greening), relating to minimum sustainability requirements and green spaces.
  • That is, the concept of a street as a social activity and not just as a walking exercise.
  • Use of sidewalks.

Citizen contributions

Urban planning guideIn a subsequent chapter, the citizens of Salt Lake City have finalized the 15 types of streets and, in general, the guide, providing more feedback through the enabled web platform. In order to make it more accessible, it offers a map, which distinguishes the type of streets according to a color code and in which comments can be added to each street. This way, urban planners gain valuable insights about its given or expected usage well before construction machinery starts rolling.After this phase, the authorities will draw up a final draft of the guide, the standards of which will be used by urban planners when the city’s next map is designed.

Towards a more humane and inclusive urban planning

Citizen participation in matters of urban planning can push towards the development of streets and blocks far more accessible, taking into account both large collectives and also minorities, empowering stakeholders at all levels and reducing the dependence on simple statistics that may distort the full picture. These measures can be complemented with innovative projects such as Block by block, which allows citizens to create a basic digital twin using the popular videogame Minecraft.The basic needs of each city can drastically differ due to their soecieties, economies and preexisting circumstances. All in all, the most common reactions of the Salt Lake City inhabitants tend to demand more public space for people and less for vehicles.Images | Yhz1221 (CC BY-SA 3.0), Matt Milton, Padraic Ryan (CC BY-SA 3.0), Street & Intersection Typologies Design Guide 

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

RA
Rouhollah Asadi
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
faculty member
AC
Alejandra Casanova Priego
Universidad Olmeca
Profesor
ZS
Ziv Shalev
Ziv Shalev Consultig
Founder & CEO
OM
Omid Mogharian
NATIX
CTO
LM
leslie matyas
red river books
EK
Evangelos Kemos
Deloitte
Senior EU Account Officer
PH
Philip Hockberger Hockberger
Northwestern University
Consultant
CM
Claudia Muciño
Tec de Monterrey
Bioclimatic architecture professor at Tecnologico de Monterrey
AI
ANE IBAÑEZ ZUGAZAGA
BILBAOTIK (BILBAO COUNCIL)
MANAGING DIRECTOR
AT
Alejandra Torres
Municipalidad de Córdoba - Secretaría de Planeamiento Modernización y Relaciones Internacionales
Secretary of the Planning, Modernization and International Relations office
RT
Rallou Taratori
UPV/EHU
Master student at Erasmus Mundus joint master \Smart cities and Communities-SMACCs\""
NR
Noemí Rabassa Rabassa
urv.cat
Professor
JS
Jose Santoyo
Toronto Region Board of Trade
Director Trade & Investment
GF
Geraldo Farias
Paranacidade
Work at Superintendent Executiv
GP
Gert Proba
Rostock Business
Deputy Managing Director
MG
Maria Florencia Guzman
Student
Researcher
GS
Gildo Seisdedos
IE Business School
Professor
MB
Martin Bangratz
RWTH Aachen, Chair of Planning Theory and Urban Development
Research Associate
RP
Ronit Purian
Tel Aviv University
Data science, behavioral and social aspects in the smart city
FV
Fernando Villatoro
University of Deusto
Researcher