Predictive justice keeps marching on: increased security or dystopia?
This article is also available here in Spanish.

Predictive justice keeps marching on: increased security or dystopia?

My list

Author | Lucía Burbano

Through learning patterns based on public data on violent and property crimes,scientists from the University of Chicago have developed a new algorithm that can predict future crimes one week in advance with about 90% accuracy. This is where some questions arise, but one in particular, will artificial intelligence be the new justice tool?

What is predictive justice?

Despite sounding extremely modern, jurimetrics or predictive justice is a concept that first emerged in 1949 thanks to Lee Loevinger, an American jurist who proposed using statistics and mathematical probability as a response to certain legal issues. He summarized his idea in an article published that year by the Minnesota Law Review.

Obviously, algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AI) did not exist seventy years ago, and today they can imitate cognitive processes and make decisions and resolve problems by analyzing millions of data. But the debate was already out there.

AI to predict crimes

predictive justice 2

Returning to the legal arena, Artificial Intelligence, on the one hand, reduces the time spent by Law professionals on preparing a case by analyzing millions of judicial decisions similar to those they are dealing with.

On the other hand, and focusing on predictive justice, the algorithms used by the study published by Victor Rotaru, Yi Huang, Timmy Li, James Evans and  Ishanu Chattopadhyay, use historical data in the city of Chicago on two major categories of reported incidents: violent crimes (homicides and assaults) and property offences (robberies and theft or vehicle robberies).

They chose these data because they are more likely to be reported to the police in urban areas in which there is distrust and lack of cooperation between citizens and law enforcement agencies. Apart from Chicago, this predictive system has already been tested in the cities of Atlanta, Austin, Detroit, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Portland and San Francisco.

China, Israel, United Kingdom… the predictive justice map

Also in the United States, the start-up Predpol was created jointly in 2012 as a research project by the Los Angeles police department and UCLA. Bill Bratton, the commissioner at the time, wanted to find a way of using the COMPSTAT data, the organizational management tool used by police, to facilitate predictive recommendations about how and where new crimes may be committed.

Since then, this predictive justice tool has been protecting one in 33 people in the United States, according to its website. In Pennsylvania, for example, robberies are said to have been reduced by 23% thanks to this predictive system.

Another country that uses predictive technologies in its judicial system is China. Since 2017, the artificial intelligence company Megvii has been working on an AI system that analyzes hours of video recordings, looking for unusual patterns that may be illegal in order to inform the police.

And there are more examples. The Eurocop program, developed by the University of Castellón in Spain, is creating a predictive map of specific places and times in a city where a crime may be committed.

**Cambridge University **has the predictive intelligence project Hart; Italy, XLAW; Germany, Precobs; Japan, Vaak and Israel, Cortica, which is also used in India.

Discrepancies regarding the use of AI in justice

Not everyone agrees with the use of AI in police departments. The United Kingdom’s Liberty Human Rights expressed it disagreement alleging that the use of this programs is "discriminatory" and "dangerous".

"Our research has revealed that at least 14 police forces in the United Kingdom have used or intend to use discriminatory software algorithms to predict where offences will be committed and by whom. The predictive programs aren’t neutral. They are trained by people and rely on existing police data, and so they reflect patterns of discrimination and further embed them into police practice.", they argue.

Furthermore, they warn that the public is given "very little information" about how predictive algorithms reach their decisions — and even the police don’t understand how they do it. "This lack of transparency and understanding means these programs can’t be properly scrutinized".

Lastly, they are calling on police "to end their use of these dangerous and discriminatory programs".

The debate is guaranteed.

Photographs | Unsplash/Possessed Photography, Unsplash/Tingey Injury Law Firm

Related content

Recommended profiles for you

NG
Ng Andre Gunawan
Jordan Anugerah Sentosa, PT
Director\\n
BB
Ben Bellekens
CrowdScan
CEO
DS
Dmitry Streltsov
Axis Communications, Eastern Europe
Business Development Manager, Eastern Europe
PC
Patrice Claudon
IT Trust Partner
Managing Partner
GS
Gil Shaked
Mer Group
Product Manager
MP
Margarida Patricio
Wow
Ceo
RR
richevel Richard Knowlton
Oxford Cyber Academy
Director
TL
Tebogo Legong
university of pretoria
CT
Clayton Tomazetti
HDI Seguros
Coordenador de estatistica
JM
Juan pablo Melo
Sambo
President
DR
Daniel Ralph
BT
JA
javi alvarez
grup j muntaner
MANAGER DEPARTMENT IT
KS
Kunal Sanghvi
Student
I am a third year engineering student.
GB
Gülru Belül
Papilon Savunma
DC
de Brito Christophe
ADI Global
Technical Expert
JL
Johnny lee
Axis Communications
Business Development Manager - Smart Cities/ Critical Infra/ Transport
CC
christophe.jaubert Christophe Jaubert
Vitry en action • Libérons le potentiel de Vitry-sur-Seine
Founder and currently secretary and vice-president.
CT
Cesar Tello
Private consultant
Manager
SJ
Song-EE Jung
Republic of Korea
Marketing/Marketing Teem
SH
Siti Khadijah Hamdi
Majlis Bandaraya Seberang Perai
Assistant Information Technology Officer